“ I have chosen only those heroes who set as their goal the exhaustion of life …”, Camus admitted. This is Kirillov from Dostoevsky’s Demons Don Giovanni, Commander, Alcest Moliere Adrienne Lekuvrer and many others. The storyline of the essay is such that before we meet with many historical and literary characters of the past, Camus are interesting in terms of confirming their conclusions. Sisyphus is not alone at the top, where he once again rolled his stone. However, it is worth recognizing that, as a stable doctrine, absurdism is owed specifically to Camus. Among them: Kierkegaard, Shestov, Dostoevsky, Husserl, Nietzsche and other philosophers. What then are the general laws of perception?Ĭamus conducts a serious analysis of the philosophical views of those thinkers who touched on the question of absurdity before him. Therefore, each person can understand the other only on an individual, absurd level. She, in his opinion, is very hostile to sentient beings. The author himself does not believe in the harmony of man with nature. In the life of everyone there comes a time when it is necessary to choose between action and contemplation.
Therefore, the absurdity should not be destroyed by suicide, you just need to live it by making your choice. The only meaning is the fullness of life experiences. In a state of absurdity, everything is permitted. The main thing here is a sense of absurdity, which casts doubt on the existence of God and the rationality of social structure.īut, in this way, one has to deny any aesthetic norms and rules. Studying human experience, he believes that man isolates eternal truths about himself and the surrounding space not by knowing life, but by means of feelings. Camus takes this conclusion as the starting point of his reasoning. Many scientists have come to the conclusion that human life is absurd. He was engaged in many schools and the greatest single minds. The question of the meaning or meaninglessness of existence has always been a favorite subject of study of philosophers. The problems of the essay “The Myth of Sisyphus”, in essence, are not new. The rebellious mood of Camus himself, his desire to challenge the Higher Forces, clearly manifested here. True, it is difficult for a reader with traditional thinking to imagine a happy man who is engaged in hard labor day and night. Sisyphus, according to the writer, is a happy person, because he rejects the gods and personally controls his fate. He summarizes the study of the problem of the absurdity of the existence of an individual. The composition of the essay is such that the myth of Sisyphus itself occupies only an insignificant part of the work and is placed in the epilogue.
#Camus myth of sisyphus free#
True, Camus called his work “an essay on the absurd.” This genre was not chosen by him by chance, since it presupposes a free composition of the work and leaves the author with the right to remain at least a little writer, and not just a philosopher. But the “The Myth of Sisyphus”, written in 1942, can without exaggeration be considered a purely philosophical treatise. However, the writer did not recognize himself as a philosopher in the classical sense of the word. Such is the analysis of his many critics.
It is difficult to find at least one work by Albert Camus, free from philosophical concepts. The punishment of the gods or the joy of liberated labor
0 kommentar(er)
